Due date for on-time submission: beginning of class on Wed. Sept. 28, 2016 [40 points]
Instructions for all assignments:
Question | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(a) [8] Show the computation tree resulting from using this approach on G.
At each branch of the tree, draw a picture of G with the edges selected so far coloured with a red pen.
Revision on Sept. 20: if you prefer, you can just show the computation tree, and instead of drawing pictures of the graph, label the edges with the edges of the graph that are added to the matching being constructed.
(b) [4] On the Question 1 worksheet (click here to get it), show the perfect matchings listed in the order they are output by the algorithm. Print as many copies of the worksheet as you need.
For each equivalence class: explain why they are equivalent by giving the automorphisms for mapping one to another. For example, if you have two matchings A and B, which automorphism maps A to B and also B to A. For the different equivalence classes, give me an explanation as to why the matchings are not equivalent to each other (based on their structural information and not just on the lack of an automorphism).
0: 1 4 1: 0 2 3 2: 1 5 3 3: 1 2 4 4: 0 3 5: 2 6 7 6: 5 7 7: 5 6
(a) [5] Use the face walking algorithm described in class
to walk all the faces of this embedding.
(b) [2] What is the genus of the embedding and what
surface does this correspond to?
(c) [3] Draw a nice picture of this embedding.
You can click here to get a worksheet with a picture of this graph.